BLS Insights

What Goes in the Denominator? Complying with the Allocation Rules for Distributions from Qualified Plans With After-Tax Accounts

Published on

Alloocation Rules from DistributionsCompliance starts with understanding. Understanding the rules set forth in Notice 2014-54, assisted us with the application of the rules in a situation in which a participant was entitled to take a distribution from his after-tax account only, in a qualified plan that provides and separately accounts for:

a) elective deferrals,

b) after-tax contributions, and

c) matching contributions.

As we discussed in our previous blog, Qualified Plan Distributions: IRS Issues Guidance on Allocation of After-Tax and Pretax Amounts, Notice 2014-54 clarified that multiple distributions executed simultaneously are considered to be one distribution, eliminating the need to jump through many hoops, in an inconvenient and temporarily costly attempt to achieve a tax-free distribution while complying with the rules of Notice 2009-68.

Thankful for the needed clarity, we endeavored to apply the allocation formula to a distribution solely from the plan’s post-1986 after-tax account plus its related earnings, and were suddenly fearful that we would have to wait another 5 years, until the issuance of Notice 2019-?, to get further clarity on whether the denominator should include the participant’s total account in the qualified plan, or just the after-tax account plus its related earnings.

Much of the guidance was contradictory, but a private letter ruling #200243054 with appropriate facts, along with official guidance, gave us a pretty good roadmap to the perfectly compliant answer. In the private letter ruling, it states that:

“each participant’s account is split into two separate contracts for purposes of applying the basis recovery rules of Code Section 72: one contract consists of all after-tax contributions and income allocable thereto (“Separate Contract”), and the other consists of all other amounts held under the Plan (the “Principal Contract”);

Consistently, Notice 2014-54 indicates that:

“Under § 402A(d)(4), a designated Roth account in an applicable retirement plan is treated as a separate contract from other amounts in the plan when applying the rules of § 72.”

IRS Publication 575’s example deals with a participant’s account that only included after-tax contributions and employer contributions, but pre-tax deferrals were not specifically mentioned. The Publication 575, page 17, indicates that:

“Under a defined contribution plan, your contributions (and income allocable to those contributions) may be treated as a separate contract for figuring the taxable part of any distribution. The employer contributions (and income allocable to those contributions) would not be considered part of that separate contract.

The language in the private letter ruling removes all doubt that deferral balances plus the related earnings are grouped with employer contributions in determining the balance in the Principal Contract, as discussed previously.

In a field where gray areas and the need for interpretation is commonplace, we were able to find very specific and unambiguous guidance to achieve full compliance, and complete understanding.

Photo by Eyton Z (License)

About the Author

Maria Hurd, CPA

Accounting & Auditing

More Insights from Maria

Need Additional Information?

If you need more information, please contact us so we can connect you with one of our CPA advisors who will be committed to your business and personal success. BLS is here to help!